Current Workflow

Home to proposal delivery in one guided path

Proposal Dashboard

Track draft, sent, and won work in one place.

The dashboard anchors the proposal lifecycle while the generator lives under the same domain.

Create new proposal
In flight2

Drafts and in-review proposals that still need active delivery decisions.

Due soon0

Proposals with deadlines already on the near-term clock.

Ready to send0

Reviewed proposals with exports ready and the next step clearly defined.

Pipeline Snapshot

Compact view of the current proposal pipeline

Draft2
In Review0
Sent0
Won / Lost0
Needs Attention

Urgency-ranked proposals to handle first

No proposals currently need urgent attention.

All Proposals

Filter by status and domain, then work the queue in priority order

Clear filters

Showing 2 of 2 proposals. Exported: 1.

Phase 1 Production Verification 2026-08-21
DRAFTneeds export
Next: Create export and review pricing

Internal tool proposal for PCC Verification: Controlled Phase 1 production verification record for write/read persistence across redeployment and rollback drill.

Client: PCC Verification • Type: Production persistence drill • Domain: Internal tool • Start: August 21, 2026 • Deadline: October 9, 2026 • Timeline: 6-8 weeks • Source: Generated from manual input • Internal tool • No export yet

Suggested price range: $16,000 - $30,000

Scope
  • Workflow discovery, systems mapping, and stakeholder prioritization
  • Operational tool design, implementation, QA, and rollout support
  • Permissions, handoff, and adoption planning for internal teams
Deliverables
  • Current-state workflow map and target-state operating model
  • Role-aware internal tool specification with integration requirements
  • Tested release plan with admin enablement and documentation
Timeline and tasks
  • Week 1: workflow discovery, systems inventory, and success metric definition
  • Week 2-4: design, implementation, and integration work
  • Week 5-6: QA, user acceptance testing, and refinement
  • Week 7: deployment planning, training, and operational handoff
Risks
  • Unclear process ownership can slow requirement decisions
  • Legacy system constraints may affect integration effort
Assumptions
  • Internal stakeholders provide access to current tools and process documentation
  • Pilot users are available for acceptance testing during the build
SAAOE: Secure & Auditable AI-Assisted Operating Environment
DRAFT
Next: Move into review

Software delivery proposal for University IT Lab / Corporate Compliance Department: A modular, security-focused operating environment designed to audit system behavior and detect threats via AI. It balances rigorous enforcement (MAC/RBAC) with ethical transparency, providing users with a clear dashboard of how their data and actions are monitored and protected.

Client: University IT Lab / Corporate Compliance Department • Type: Systems Security & AI Research Project • Domain: SaaS/software • Start: April 25, 2026 • Deadline: December 17, 2026 • Timeline: 8-10 weeks • Source: Generated from manual input • SaaS/software • Export ready

Suggested price range: $28,000 - $48,000

Scope
  • Product discovery, workflow definition, and success criteria alignment
  • Application UX, implementation, QA, and staged release planning
  • Operational handoff for launch, monitoring, and iteration
Deliverables
  • Prioritized product requirements and user flow specification
  • Application interface designs and engineering-ready implementation plan
  • Tested software release candidate with deployment and support notes
Timeline and tasks
  • Week 1-2: discovery, requirements framing, architecture validation, and backlog setup
  • Week 3-5: UX design, core feature implementation, and integration work
  • Week 6-7: QA, bug resolution, acceptance review, and release preparation
  • Week 8: production rollout planning, training, and handoff
Risks
  • Late product decisions can reshape implementation scope
  • Third-party dependency changes may affect feature sequencing
Assumptions
  • A client product owner can provide prompt requirement decisions
  • Existing systems and APIs needed for delivery are available for testing